Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
EWT vs VCLT: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWT returned +69.9% to VCLT's −5.9%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about EWT and VCLT
Net assets: $12.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF, and $7.5bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF.
Pair scorecard
VCLT costs 0.56 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 75.8 points; EWT is 1.6 times larger.
| Measure | EWT | VCLT |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +69.9% | −5.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 7.7%, high on Oct 5, 2026 | 17.8%, high on Sep 22, 2021 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index | Bloomberg U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Bond Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $12.3bn | $7.5bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 47.7% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Dec 4, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026 · 881 weekly returnsEWT returned more: +718.0% to +101.2%. VCLT swung less: 12.5% to 20.6%. VCLT fell less at its worst: −34.0% to −38.2%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | EWT | VCLT | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +718.0% | +101.2% | EWT | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +13.2% | +4.2% | EWT | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +322.6% | −6.3% | EWT | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 20.6% | 12.5% | VCLT | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 14.2% | 8.7% | VCLT | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −38.2% | −34.0% | VCLT | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.63 | 0.27 | EWT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.92 | 0.39 | EWT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.35 | 0.12 | EWT | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 881 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, EWT and VCLT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
EWT and VCLT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EWT and VCLT do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. EWT follows MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index and VCLT follows Bloomberg U.S. 10+ Year Corporate Bond Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EWT returned +69.9% and VCLT −5.9% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 75.8 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
EWT
EWT tracks the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +69.9% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 79 positions, with the top ten at 47.7%. It sat 7.7% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
VCLT
VCLT tracks an index of Long-Term Corporate Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −5.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 17.8% below its high of Sep 22, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EWT or VCLT?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +69.9% and VCLT −5.9%.
- Which is cheaper, EWT or VCLT?
- VCLT is cheaper, by 0.56 percentage points a year. That is about $56 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, EWT against VCLT, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-vclt
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). EWT against VCLT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-vclt
[EWT against VCLT (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-vclt)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.