Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
EWL vs EWP: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWL returned +14.5% to EWP's +15.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about EWL and EWP
Net assets: $3.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF, and $2.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI Spain ETF.
Pair scorecard
Both cost 0.50% a year; their one-year returns differ by 1.1 points; EWL is 1.5 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | EWL | EWP |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +14.5% | +15.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 10.2%, high on Aug 24, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI Switzerland 25/50 Index | MSCI Spain 25/50 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.50% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 23, 2026 | $2.9bn | $2.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 65.3% | 73.9% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Apr 11, 2008 to Oct 23, 2026 · 967 weekly returns · each against ACWXEWL returned more: +266.3% to +101.9%. EWL swung less: 18.1% to 26.2%. EWL fell less at its worst: −49.0% to −58.6%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | EWL | EWP | ACWX | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | |||||
| Total return | +266.3% | +101.9% | +129.8% | EWL | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +7.2% | +3.9% | +4.6% | EWL | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +146.5% | −5.8% | +42.8% | EWL | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | |||||
| Volatility | 18.1% | 26.2% | 19.8% | EWL | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 12.9% | 18.7% | 14.4% | EWL | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −49.0% | −58.6% | −59.4% | EWL | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 77.0% | 127.0% | 100.0% | EWP | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. |
| Downside capture | 85.4% | 109.8% | 100.0% | EWL | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. |
| Beta | 0.80 | 1.11 | 1.00 | EWL lower | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.76 | 0.70 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | |||||
| Sharpe | 0.40 | 0.22 | 0.25 | EWL | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.56 | 0.31 | 0.35 | EWL | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.090 | 0.052 | 0.050 | EWL | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. |
| Calmar | 0.15 | 0.07 | 0.08 | EWL | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | |||||
| Benchmark | ACWX | ACWX | ACWX | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +3.2% a year | +0.2% a year | 0.0% | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 1.55 | 0.07 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. | |
| Alpha range | −0.8% to +7.2% | −6.3% to +6.8% | Both include zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. | |
| Information ratio | 0.22 | 0.05 | EWL | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 9.7% | 14.5% | 0.0% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 967 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, EWL and EWP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
EWL and EWP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EWL and EWP are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. EWL follows MSCI Switzerland 25/50 Index and EWP follows MSCI Spain 25/50 Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return (similar). Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EWL returned +14.5% and EWP +15.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 1.1 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
EWL
EWL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.5% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 43 positions, with the top ten at 65.3%.
EWP
EWP tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.6% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 25 positions, with the top ten at 73.9%. It sat 10.2% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, EWL against EWP, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewl-vs-ewp
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). EWL against EWP. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewl-vs-ewp
[EWL against EWP (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewl-vs-ewp)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.