Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWL vs HEDJ: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWL returned +14.5% to HEDJ's +8.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWL and HEDJ

Net assets: $3.0bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF, and $1.8bn on Jun 30, 2026 for WisdomTree Europe Hedged Equity Fund.

At a glance
+14.5%
EWL total return, 1 year
+8.6%
HEDJ total return, 1 year
0.50%
EWL expense ratio
0.58%
HEDJ expense ratio

Pair scorecard

EWL costs 0.08 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.9 points.

EWL vs HEDJ: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWLHEDJ
Return
Total return, 1 year+14.5%+8.6%
Drawdown
Below its high4.3%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Switzerland 25/50 IndexWisdomTree Europe Hedged Equity Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.50%0.58%
Net assets, EWL as of Oct 28, 2026 and HEDJ as of Jun 30, 2026$3.0bn$1.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund65.3%41.1%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EWL and HEDJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWL HEDJ
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWL
ROCHE PS PAR AG 14.99%
NOVARTIS AG 12.54%
NESTLE SA 11.36%
UBS GROUP AG 5.83%
ZURICH INSURANCE GROUP AG 4.57%
ABB LTD 3.88%
COMPAGNIE FINANCIERE RICHEMONT SA 3.87%
LONZA GROUP AG 2.94%
Only in HEDJ
ASML HOLDING NV 7.50%
BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA SA 6.34%
BANCO SANTANDER SA 4.84%
SIEMENS AG 4.19%
LVMH MOET HENNESSY LOUIS VUITTON SE 3.96%
SANOFI SA 3.49%
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG 3.17%
L'OREAL SA 3.05%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWL iShares MSCI Switzerland ETF HEDJ WisdomTree Europe Hedged Equity Fund
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +14.5% +8.6%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (ACWX) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +0.2 pts vs ACWX not measured
Expense ratio 0.50% 0.58%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 43 130
Net assets, EWL as of Oct 28, 2026 and HEDJ as of Jun 30, 2026 $3.0bn $1.8bn

EWL and HEDJ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EWL flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWL

EWL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.5% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 43 positions, with the top ten at 65.3%.

HEDJ

HEDJ tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +8.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.58% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 130 positions, with the top ten at 41.1%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWL or HEDJ?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWL returned +14.5% and HEDJ +8.6%.
Which is cheaper, EWL or HEDJ?
EWL is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. That is about $8 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EWL and HEDJ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWL and 0% of HEDJ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWL against HEDJ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewl-vs-hedj

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.