Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWP vs FEZ: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWP returned +15.6% to FEZ's +6.0%; 11% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWP and FEZ

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $2.0bn for iShares MSCI Spain ETF and $4.1bn for State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF.

At a glance
+15.6%
EWP total return, 1 year
+6.0%
FEZ total return, 1 year
0.50%
EWP expense ratio
0.29%
FEZ expense ratio

Pair scorecard

FEZ costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.6 points; FEZ is 2.1 times larger.

EWP vs FEZ: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWPFEZ
Return
Total return, 1 year+15.6%+6.0%
Drawdown
Below its high10.2%, high on Aug 24, 20269.0%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Spain 25/50 IndexEURO STOXX 50 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.50%0.29%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$2.0bn$4.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common11%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund73.9%42.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 11, 2008 to Oct 23, 2026 · 967 weekly returns · each against ACWX
EWP FEZ
Return
Total return edge FEZ (slight) +101.9% +105.3%
Annualized edge FEZ (slight) +3.9% +3.9%
Price return edge FEZ −5.8% +12.9%
Risk
Volatility edge FEZ (slight) 26.2% 24.6%
Max drawdown edge EWP (slight) −58.6% −60.8%
Downside capture 109.8% 109.3%
Beta 1.11 1.16
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge Tie 0.22 0.22
Sortino edge Tie 0.31 0.31
Treynor 0.052 0.047
Calmar edge Tie 0.07 0.06
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.2% a year −0.3% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.07 −0.15
Information ratio 0.05 0.05
Tracking error 14.5% 9.5%
Reading

FEZ returned slightly more: +105.3% to +101.9%. FEZ swung slightly less: 24.6% to 26.2%. EWP fell slightly less at its worst: −58.6% to −60.8%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: EWP vs FEZ: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWPFEZACWXEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+101.9%+105.3%+129.8%FEZ (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+3.9%+3.9%+4.6%FEZ (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return−5.8%+12.9%+42.8%FEZPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility26.2%24.6%19.8%FEZ (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation18.7%17.7%14.4%FEZ (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−58.6%−60.8%−59.4%EWP (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture127.0%125.7%100.0%TieShare of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture109.8%109.3%100.0%TieShare of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.111.161.00EWP lowerHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.700.871.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.220.220.25TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.310.310.35TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0520.0470.050EWP (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.070.060.08TieAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkACWXACWXACWXThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.2% a year−0.3% a year0.0%Not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.07−0.15Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−6.3% to +6.8%−4.4% to +3.8%Both include zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.050.05EWP (slight)Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error14.5%9.5%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 967 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

11%

By the books each fund has filed, EWP and FEZ hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

11% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWP FEZ
BANCO SANTANDER 17.78% 3.83%
IBERDROLA 13.78% 3.08%
BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA 13.20% 2.87%
INDUSTRIA DE DISENO TEXTIL SA 4.53% 1.43%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWP
REPSOL 4.81%
AMADEUS IT GROUP 4.26%
CAIXABANK SA 4.20%
FERROVIAL NV 4.00%
AENA SME SA 3.75%
BANCO DE SABADELL 3.57%
ENDESA SA 3.31%
NATURGY ENERGY GROUP SA 3.24%
Only in FEZ
ASML HOLDING NV 10.09%
SAP SE 4.85%
SIEMENS AG REG 4.42%
TOTALENERGIES SE 4.28%
ALLIANZ SE REG 3.74%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE 3.18%
AIRBUS SE 2.57%
UNICREDIT SPA 2.54%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWP iShares MSCI Spain ETF FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +15.6% +6.0%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (ACWX) +14.3% (ACWX)
Gap to its benchmark +1.3 pts vs ACWX −8.3 pts vs ACWX
Expense ratio 0.50% 0.29%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 25 52
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $2.0bn $4.1bn

EWP and FEZ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-28E08393A4

EWP and FEZ are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. EWP follows MSCI Spain 25/50 Index and FEZ follows EURO STOXX 50 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 11% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EWP returned +15.6% and FEZ +6.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 9.6 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

EWP and FEZ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWP

EWP tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.6% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 25 positions, with the top ten at 73.9%. It sat 10.2% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

FEZ

FEZ tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.0% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 42.9%. It sat 9.0% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWP or FEZ?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWP returned +15.6% and FEZ +6.0%.
Which is cheaper, EWP or FEZ?
FEZ is cheaper, by 0.21 percentage points a year. That is about $21 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EWP and FEZ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWP and 0% of FEZ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWP against FEZ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewp-vs-fez

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.