Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWJ vs NOBL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWJ returned +18.1% to NOBL's +15.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWJ and NOBL

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $23.9bn for iShares MSCI Japan ETF and $11.6bn for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.

At a glance
+18.1%
EWJ total return, 1 year
+15.5%
NOBL total return, 1 year
0.49%
EWJ expense ratio
0.35%
NOBL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

NOBL costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.6 points; EWJ is 2.1 times larger.

EWJ vs NOBL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWJNOBL
Return
Total return, 1 year+18.1%+15.5%
Drawdown
Below its high4.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Japan IndexS&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.49%0.35%
Net assets$23.9bn$11.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund29.5%17.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EWJ and NOBL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWJ NOBL
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWJ
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 4.40%
TOYOTA MOTOR 3.59%
ADVANTEST 3.03%
HITACHI 3.03%
RECRUIT HOLDINGS LTD 3.03%
SONY GROUP 2.89%
SUMITOMO MITSUI FINANCIAL GROUP 2.83%
TOKYO ELECTRON 2.55%
Only in NOBL
ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC 1.81%
BECTON DICKINSON AND CO 1.78%
FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC 1.77%
INTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP 1.70%
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING 1.69%
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO 1.67%
CHEVRON CORP 1.66%
ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY-CL A 1.64%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI Japan Tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats
Total return, 1 year +18.1% +15.5%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (ACWX) not measured
Gap to its benchmark +3.8 pts vs ACWX not measured
Expense ratio 0.49% 0.35%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 98.3%
Holdings 169 69
Net assets $23.9bn $11.6bn

EWJ and NOBL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EWJ and NOBL flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWJ

EWJ tracks the MSCI Japan. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 169 positions, with the top ten at 29.5%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

NOBL

NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 17.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWJ or NOBL?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWJ returned +18.1% and NOBL +15.5%.
Which is cheaper, EWJ or NOBL?
NOBL is cheaper, by 0.14 percentage points a year. That is about $14 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EWJ and NOBL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWJ and 98% of NOBL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWJ against NOBL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewj-vs-nobl

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.