Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
EWT vs NOBL: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWT returned +69.9% to NOBL's +15.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about EWT and NOBL
Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $12.0bn for iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF and $11.6bn for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.
Pair scorecard
NOBL costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 54.4 points.
| Measure | EWT | NOBL |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +69.9% | +15.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 7.7%, high on Oct 5, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index | S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 0.35% |
| Net assets | $12.0bn | $11.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 47.7% | 17.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Oct 18, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 679 weekly returnsEWT returned more: +529.3% to +264.8%. NOBL swung less: 15.4% to 20.6%. NOBL fell less at its worst: −31.7% to −38.2%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | EWT | NOBL | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +529.3% | +264.8% | EWT | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +15.1% | +10.4% | EWT | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +258.3% | +179.1% | EWT | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 20.6% | 15.4% | NOBL | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 14.1% | 10.8% | NOBL | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −38.2% | −31.7% | NOBL | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.69 | 0.59 | EWT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.01 | 0.84 | EWT | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.40 | 0.33 | EWT | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 679 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, EWT and NOBL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
EWT and NOBL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EWT and NOBL do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. EWT follows MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index and NOBL follows S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EWT returned +69.9% and NOBL +15.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 54.4 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
EWT
EWT tracks the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +69.9% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 79 positions, with the top ten at 47.7%. It sat 7.7% below its high of Oct 5, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
NOBL
NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 17.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EWT or NOBL?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWT returned +69.9% and NOBL +15.5%.
- Which is cheaper, EWT or NOBL?
- NOBL is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, EWT against NOBL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-nobl
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). EWT against NOBL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-nobl
[EWT against NOBL (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewt-vs-nobl)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.