Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

NOBL vs VPL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, NOBL returned +15.5% to VPL's +24.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about NOBL and VPL

Net assets: $11.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF, and $9.0bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF.

At a glance
+15.5%
NOBL total return, 1 year
+24.8%
VPL total return, 1 year
0.35%
NOBL expense ratio
0.07%
VPL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VPL costs 0.28 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.3 points; NOBL is 1.2 times larger.

NOBL vs VPL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureNOBLVPL
Return
Total return, 1 year+15.5%+24.8%
Drawdown
Below its high7.2%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats IndexFTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.35%0.07%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$10.9bn$9.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund17.0%24.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, NOBL and VPL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first NOBL VPL
Only in one fund ↓
Only in NOBL
ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC 1.81%
BECTON DICKINSON AND CO 1.78%
FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC 1.77%
INTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP 1.70%
AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING 1.69%
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO 1.67%
CHEVRON CORP 1.66%
ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY-CL A 1.64%
Only in VPL
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 7.11%
SK hynix Inc 5.82%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 1.98%
BHP Group Ltd 1.69%
SLBBH1142 1.57%
Toyota Motor Corp 1.51%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia 1.37%
Tokyo Electron Ltd 1.30%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Tracks an index of Pacific Stock
Total return, 1 year +15.5% +24.8%
Expense ratio 0.35% 0.07%
Already in the S&P 500 98.3% 0.0%
Holdings 69 2343
Net assets, NOBL as of Oct 28, 2026 and VPL as of Sep 30, 2026 $11.6bn $9.0bn

NOBL and VPL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

NOBL flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
NOBL

NOBL tracks the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 17.0%.

VPL

VPL tracks an index of Pacific Stock. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,343 positions, with the top ten at 24.8%. It sat 7.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, NOBL or VPL?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, NOBL returned +15.5% and VPL +24.8%.
Which is cheaper, NOBL or VPL?
VPL is cheaper, by 0.28 percentage points a year. That is about $28 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do NOBL and VPL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 98% of NOBL and 0% of VPL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, NOBL against VPL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/nobl-vs-vpl

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.