Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

COWZ vs VPL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, COWZ returned +24.4% to VPL's +24.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about COWZ and VPL

Net assets: $19.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF, and $9.0bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF.

At a glance
+24.4%
COWZ total return, 1 year
+24.8%
VPL total return, 1 year
0.49%
COWZ expense ratio
0.07%
VPL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

VPL costs 0.42 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.4 points.

COWZ vs VPL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCOWZVPL
Return
Total return, 1 year+24.4%+24.8%
Drawdown
Below its high7.2%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksPacer US Cash Cows 100 IndexFTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.49%0.07%
Net assets, COWZ as of Oct 27, 2026 and VPL as of Sep 30, 2026$19.5bn$9.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund20.4%24.8%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and VPL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first COWZ VPL
Carnival Corp Ltd 0.91% 0.01%
EQT Corp 1.20% 0.00%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in COWZ
Booking Holdings Inc 2.23%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.18%
HCA Healthcare Inc 2.07%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 2.06%
General Dynamics Corp 2.05%
Intuit Inc 2.04%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.97%
AT&T Inc 1.95%
Only in VPL
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 7.11%
SK hynix Inc 5.82%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 1.98%
BHP Group Ltd 1.69%
SLBBH1142 1.57%
Toyota Motor Corp 1.51%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia 1.37%
Tokyo Electron Ltd 1.30%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF VPL Vanguard FTSE Pacific ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100 Tracks an index of Pacific Stock
Total return, 1 year +24.4% +24.8%
Expense ratio 0.49% 0.07%
Already in the S&P 500 94.7% 0.0%
Holdings 100 2343
Net assets, COWZ as of Oct 27, 2026 and VPL as of Sep 30, 2026 $19.5bn $9.0bn

COWZ and VPL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

COWZ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
COWZ

COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.

VPL

VPL tracks an index of Pacific Stock. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Sep 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,343 positions, with the top ten at 24.8%. It sat 7.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or VPL?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +24.4% and VPL +24.8%.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or VPL?
VPL is cheaper, by 0.42 percentage points a year. That is about $42 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do COWZ and VPL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of COWZ and 0% of VPL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, COWZ against VPL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-vpl

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.