Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWG vs EWP: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWG returned +2.2% to EWP's +15.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWG and EWP

Net assets: $1.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI Germany ETF, and $2.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI Spain ETF.

At a glance
+2.2%
EWG total return, 1 year
+15.6%
EWP total return, 1 year
0.49%
EWG expense ratio
0.50%
EWP expense ratio

Pair scorecard

EWG costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 13.4 points; EWP is 1.3 times larger.

EWG vs EWP: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWGEWP
Return
Total return, 1 year+2.2%+15.6%
Drawdown
Below its high6.3%, high on Aug 28, 202610.2%, high on Aug 24, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Germany 25/50 IndexMSCI Spain 25/50 Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.49%0.50%
Net assets, as of Oct 23, 2026$1.5bn$2.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund63.4%73.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 11, 2008 to Oct 23, 2026 · 967 weekly returns · each against ACWX
EWG EWP
Return
Total return edge EWG (slight) +104.6% +101.9%
Annualized edge Tie +3.9% +3.9%
Price return edge EWG +29.7% −5.8%
Risk
Volatility edge EWG (slight) 24.6% 26.2%
Max drawdown edge EWP (slight) −60.9% −58.6%
Downside capture 106.9% 109.8%
Beta 1.14 1.11
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge Tie 0.22 0.22
Sortino edge Tie 0.31 0.31
Treynor 0.048 0.052
Calmar edge Tie 0.06 0.07
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.3% a year +0.2% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.12 0.07
Information ratio 0.04 0.05
Tracking error 10.1% 14.5%
Reading

EWG returned slightly more: +104.6% to +101.9%. EWG swung slightly less: 24.6% to 26.2%. EWP fell slightly less at its worst: −58.6% to −60.9%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: EWG vs EWP: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWGEWPACWXEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+104.6%+101.9%+129.8%EWG (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+3.9%+3.9%+4.6%TieTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+29.7%−5.8%+42.8%EWGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility24.6%26.2%19.8%EWG (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation17.7%18.7%14.4%EWG (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−60.9%−58.6%−59.4%EWP (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture117.2%127.0%100.0%EWP (slight)Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture106.9%109.8%100.0%EWG (slight)Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.141.111.00EWP lowerHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.840.701.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.220.220.25TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.310.310.35TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0480.0520.050EWP (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.060.070.08TieAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkACWXACWXACWXThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.3% a year+0.2% a year0.0%Not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.120.07Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−4.7% to +4.2%−6.3% to +6.8%Both include zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.040.05EWPReturn against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error10.1%14.5%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 967 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, EWG and EWP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWG EWP
EUR/USD 0.00% 0.00%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWG
SAP 12.93%
SIEMENS N AG 11.52%
ALLIANZ 9.90%
SIEMENS ENERGY N AG 5.96%
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM N AG 5.11%
MUENCHENER RUECKVERSICHERUNGS-GESE 4.21%
INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG 4.11%
DEUTSCHE BOERSE AG 3.40%
Only in EWP
BANCO SANTANDER 17.78%
IBERDROLA 13.78%
BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA 13.20%
REPSOL 4.81%
INDUSTRIA DE DISENO TEXTIL SA 4.53%
AMADEUS IT GROUP 4.26%
CAIXABANK SA 4.20%
FERROVIAL NV 4.00%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWG iShares MSCI Germany ETF EWP iShares MSCI Spain ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +2.2% +15.6%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (ACWX) +14.3% (ACWX)
Gap to its benchmark −12.1 pts vs ACWX +1.3 pts vs ACWX
Expense ratio 0.49% 0.50%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 52 25
Net assets, EWG as of Oct 28, 2026 and EWP as of Oct 27, 2026 $1.5bn $2.0bn

EWG and EWP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-B74B93A814

EWG and EWP are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. EWG follows MSCI Germany 25/50 Index and EWP follows MSCI Spain 25/50 Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EWG returned +2.2% and EWP +15.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 13.4 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

EWG and EWP flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWG

EWG tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.2% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 63.4%. It sat 6.3% below its high of Aug 28, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

EWP

EWP tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.6% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 25 positions, with the top ten at 73.9%. It sat 10.2% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWG or EWP?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWG returned +2.2% and EWP +15.6%.
Which is cheaper, EWG or EWP?
EWG is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EWG and EWP overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWG and 0% of EWP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWG against EWP, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewg-vs-ewp

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.