Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EWG vs EZU: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EWG returned +2.2% to EZU's +7.1%; 26% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EWG and EZU

Net assets: $1.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI Germany ETF, and $9.2bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF.

At a glance
+2.2%
EWG total return, 1 year
+7.1%
EZU total return, 1 year
0.49%
EWG expense ratio
0.50%
EZU expense ratio

Pair scorecard

EWG costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.9 points; EZU is 6.1 times larger.

EWG vs EZU: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWGEZU
Return
Total return, 1 year+2.2%+7.1%
Drawdown
Below its high6.3%, high on Aug 28, 20268.7%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI Germany 25/50 IndexMSCI EMU Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.49%0.50%
Net assets, as of Oct 23, 2026$1.5bn$9.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common26%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund63.4%30.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 11, 2008 to Oct 23, 2026 · 967 weekly returns · each against ACWX
EWG EZU
Return
Total return edge EWG (slight) +104.6% +102.1%
Annualized edge Tie +3.9% +3.9%
Price return edge EWG +29.7% +17.3%
Risk
Volatility edge EZU (slight) 24.6% 23.7%
Max drawdown edge EWG (slight) −60.9% −62.6%
Downside capture 106.9% 107.7%
Beta 1.14 1.12
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge Tie 0.22 0.22
Sortino edge EWG (slight) 0.31 0.30
Treynor 0.048 0.046
Calmar edge EWG (slight) 0.06 0.06
Against the benchmark
Alpha −0.3% a year −0.5% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.12 −0.24
Information ratio 0.04 0.02
Tracking error 10.1% 8.6%
Reading

EWG returned slightly more: +104.6% to +102.1%. EZU swung slightly less: 23.7% to 24.6%. EWG fell slightly less at its worst: −60.9% to −62.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: EWG vs EZU: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEWGEZUACWXEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+104.6%+102.1%+129.8%EWG (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+3.9%+3.9%+4.6%TieTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+29.7%+17.3%+42.8%EWGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility24.6%23.7%19.8%EZU (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation17.7%17.2%14.4%EZU (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−60.9%−62.6%−59.4%EWG (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture117.2%119.8%100.0%EZU (slight)Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture106.9%107.7%100.0%TieShare of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.141.121.00TieHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.840.881.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.220.220.25TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.310.300.35EWG (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0480.0460.050EWG (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.060.060.08EWG (slight)Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkACWXACWXACWXThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−0.3% a year−0.5% a year0.0%Not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.12−0.24Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−4.7% to +4.2%−4.2% to +3.3%Both include zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.040.02EWGReturn against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error10.1%8.6%0.0%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 967 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

26%

By the books each fund has filed, EWG and EZU hold 26% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

26% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first EWG EZU
SAP 12.93% 3.33%
SIEMENS N AG 11.52% 2.97%
ALLIANZ 9.90% 2.55%
SIEMENS ENERGY N AG 5.96% 1.53%
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM N AG 5.11% 1.32%
MUENCHENER RUECKVERSICHERUNGS-GESE 4.21% 1.08%
INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG 4.11% 1.06%
DEUTSCHE BOERSE AG 3.40% 0.87%
DHL AG 3.24% 0.83%
DEUTSCHE BANK AG 2.97% 0.76%
RHEINMETALL AG 2.87% 0.74%
BASF N 2.71% 0.70%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in EWG
DAX INDEX DEC 26 0.00%
EUR/USD 0.00%
Only in EZU
ASML HOLDING 8.79%
BANCO SANTANDER 2.48%
TOTALENERGIES 2.48%
IBERDROLA 2.10%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC 2.05%
BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA 1.95%
AIRBUS GROUP 1.76%
LAIR LIQUIDE SOCIETE ANONYME POUR 1.67%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

EWG iShares MSCI Germany ETF EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks the MSCI Eurozone
Total return, 1 year +2.2% +7.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (ACWX) +14.3% (ACWX)
Gap to its benchmark −12.1 pts vs ACWX −7.2 pts vs ACWX
Expense ratio 0.49% 0.50%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 52 216
Net assets, EWG as of Oct 28, 2026 and EZU as of Oct 27, 2026 $1.5bn $9.2bn

EWG and EZU on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-6716D7F54C

EWG and EZU are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. EWG follows MSCI Germany 25/50 Index and EZU follows MSCI EMU Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 26% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EWG returned +2.2% and EZU +7.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 4.9 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

EWG and EZU flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EWG

EWG tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.2% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 63.4%. It sat 6.3% below its high of Aug 28, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

EZU

EZU tracks the MSCI Eurozone. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +7.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 216 positions, with the top ten at 30.5%. It sat 8.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EWG or EZU?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EWG returned +2.2% and EZU +7.1%.
Which is cheaper, EWG or EZU?
EWG is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EWG and EZU overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EWG and 0% of EZU by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EWG against EZU, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ewg-vs-ezu

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.