Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
EMLP vs FTCS: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EMLP returned +19.6% to FTCS's +9.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about EMLP and FTCS
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $4.2bn for First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund and $7.8bn for First Trust Capital Strength ETF.
Pair scorecard
FTCS costs 0.42 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.1 points; FTCS is 1.9 times larger.
| Measure | EMLP | FTCS |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +19.6% | +9.5% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Capital Strength Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.95% | 0.53% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $4.2bn | $7.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 42.0% | 21.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Jun 29, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026 · 747 weekly returnsFTCS returned more: +453.6% to +262.7%. FTCS swung less: 14.3% to 16.6%. FTCS fell less at its worst: −29.0% to −39.0%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | EMLP | FTCS | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +262.7% | +453.6% | FTCS | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +9.4% | +12.7% | FTCS | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +115.0% | +353.5% | FTCS | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 16.6% | 14.3% | FTCS | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 12.2% | 9.8% | FTCS | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −39.0% | −29.0% | FTCS | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.52 | 0.78 | FTCS | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.71 | 1.14 | FTCS | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.24 | 0.44 | FTCS | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 747 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, EMLP and FTCS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
EMLP and FTCS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EMLP and FTCS are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. EMLP follows No index, actively managed and FTCS follows Capital Strength Index.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EMLP returned +19.6% and FTCS +9.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 10.1 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
EMLP
EMLP is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.95% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 59 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%.
FTCS
FTCS tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.53% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 50 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EMLP or FTCS?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMLP returned +19.6% and FTCS +9.5%.
- Which is cheaper, EMLP or FTCS?
- FTCS is cheaper, by 0.42 percentage points a year. That is about $42 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, EMLP against FTCS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emlp-vs-ftcs
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). EMLP against FTCS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emlp-vs-ftcs
[EMLP against FTCS (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emlp-vs-ftcs)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.