Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
EMB vs XLC: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EMB returned −0.4% to XLC's −10.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about EMB and XLCNet assets: $13.2bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF, and $22.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF.
Pair scorecard
XLC costs 0.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.0 points; XLC is 1.7 times larger.
| Measure | EMB | XLC |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −0.4% | −10.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.5%, high on Jun 29, 2026 | 13.3%, high on Jan 30, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core Index | Communication Services Select Sector Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $13.2bn | $22.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 100% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 75.3% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, EMB and XLC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
EMB and XLC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EMB
EMB tracks the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. It sat 3.5% below its high of Jun 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
XLC
XLC tracks an index of Communication services. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −10.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 23 positions, with the top ten at 75.3%. It sat 13.3% below its high of Jan 30, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EMB or XLC?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned −0.4% and XLC −10.4%.
- Which is cheaper, EMB or XLC?
- XLC is cheaper, by 0.31 percentage points a year. That is about $31 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, EMB against XLC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emb-vs-xlc
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). EMB against XLC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emb-vs-xlc
[EMB against XLC (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emb-vs-xlc)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.