Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
EMB vs FBCG: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EMB returned −0.4% to FBCG's +9.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about EMB and FBCG
Net assets: $13.2bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF, and $7.6bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF.
Pair scorecard
EMB costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.9 points; EMB is 1.7 times larger.
| Measure | EMB | FBCG |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −0.4% | +9.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.5%, high on Jun 29, 2026 | 5.7%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.57% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $12.9bn | $7.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| In the S&P 500, by weight | 85% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.2% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Jun 12, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 332 weekly returnsFBCG returned more: +197.7% to +15.3%. EMB swung less: 8.7% to 23.9%. EMB fell less at its worst: −27.9% to −42.6%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | EMB | FBCG | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +15.3% | +197.7% | FBCG | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +2.2% | +18.6% | FBCG | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −14.9% | +197.2% | FBCG | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 8.7% | 23.9% | EMB | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 6.3% | 15.5% | EMB | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −27.9% | −42.6% | EMB | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | −0.06 | 0.71 | FBCG | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | −0.08 | 1.09 | FBCG | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.08 | 0.44 | FBCG | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 332 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, EMB and FBCG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
EMB and FBCG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EMB and FBCG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. EMB follows J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core Index and FBCG follows No index, actively managed.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 EMB returned −0.4% and FBCG +9.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 9.9 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
EMB
EMB tracks the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. It sat 3.5% below its high of Jun 29, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
FBCG
FBCG is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 230 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EMB or FBCG?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned −0.4% and FBCG +9.5%.
- Which is cheaper, EMB or FBCG?
- EMB is cheaper, by 0.18 percentage points a year. That is about $18 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, EMB against FBCG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emb-vs-fbcg
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). EMB against FBCG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emb-vs-fbcg
[EMB against FBCG (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emb-vs-fbcg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.