Which returned more over the last year, EMB or ONEQ?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and ONEQ returned +20.6%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EMB or ONEQ?

EMB charges 0.39% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so ONEQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EMB vs ONEQ: how they differ

EMB and ONEQ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.

iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EMB and ONEQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EMB	Only in ONEQ
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.84%	NVIDIA CORP 11.24%
EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL RegS 0.50%	APPLE INC 10.04%
UKRAINE (REPUBLIC OF) C BONDS RegS 0.42%	MICROSOFT CORP 7.32%
ECUADOR REPUBLIC OF (GOVERNMENT) RegS 0.34%	AMAZON.COM INC 6.37%
GHANA (REPUBLIC OF) DISCO RegS 0.31%	ALPHABET INC 4.85%
CHINA LIFE INSURANCE OVERSEAS CO L RegS 0.28%	BROADCOM INC 4.64%
REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY 0.27%	ALPHABET INC 4.48%
ANGOLA (REPUBLIC OF) RegS 0.26%	TESLA INC 3.58%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

EMB and ONEQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF	ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Fidelity
What it is	J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond	Nasdaq Composite
Total return, 1 year	+2.8%	+20.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−14.7 pts	+3.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.39%	0.21%
Holdings	612	1022

EMB in plain words

EMB is a bond fund tracking the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.

ONEQ in plain words

ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EMB or ONEQ?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EMB returned +2.8% and ONEQ returned +20.6%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EMB or ONEQ?: EMB charges 0.39% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so ONEQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EMB against ONEQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EMB against ONEQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/emb-vs-oneq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources