Which returned more over the last year, EFA or SCHP?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EFA returned +18.2% and SCHP returned −0.8%, so EFA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EFA or SCHP?

EFA charges 0.32% a year and SCHP charges 0.03%, so SCHP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EFA vs SCHP: how they differ

EFA and SCHP hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EFA returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI EAFE ETF and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EFA and SCHP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EFA	Only in SCHP
ASML HOLDING 3.01%	United States Treasury 4.09%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.61%	United States Treasury 4.03%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.36%	United States Treasury 4.02%
SHELL PLC 1.25%	United States Treasury 3.79%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 1.15%	United States Treasury 3.62%
NOVARTIS AG 1.15%	United States Treasury 3.42%
NESTLE SA 1.12%	United States Treasury 3.39%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.09%	United States Treasury 3.38%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

EFA and SCHP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF	SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	Schwab
What it is	Developed markets ex US	US TIPS
Total return, 1 year	+18.2%	−0.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+0.7 pts	−18.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.32%	0.03%
Holdings	670	48

EFA in plain words

EFA is an index equity fund tracking the Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 670 positions, with the top ten at 13.8%.

SCHP in plain words

SCHP is a bond fund tracking the US TIPS. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EFA or SCHP?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EFA returned +18.2% and SCHP returned −0.8%, so EFA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EFA or SCHP?: EFA charges 0.32% a year and SCHP charges 0.03%, so SCHP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EFA against SCHP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EFA against SCHP, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/efa-vs-schp Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources