Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EFA vs PFF: how they differ

EFA and PFF hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and EFA returned more over the year.

iShares MSCI EAFE ETF and iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EFA and PFF hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions EFA and PFF both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingEFAPFF
SANOFI SA0.42%0.17%
PRUDENTIAL PLC0.15%0.13%
ARISTOCRAT LEISURE0.10%0.10%
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM N AG0.50%0.07%
HELVETIA BALOISE HOLDING N AG0.09%0.06%
COMPAGNIE FINANCIERE RICHEMONT SA0.52%0.05%
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY0.03%0.61%
KONINKLIJKE AHOLD DELHAIZE0.14%0.03%
LAND SECURITIES GROUP REIT PLC0.03%0.06%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in EFAOnly in PFF
ASML HOLDING 3.01%BOEING CO 3.54%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.61%ORACLE CORPORATION 2.31%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.36%SUPER MICRO COMPUTER INC 2.30%
SHELL PLC 1.25%ALPHABET INC 2.24%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 1.15%HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE CONV PR 2.06%
NOVARTIS AG 1.15%ALBEMARLE CORP 1.12%
NESTLE SA 1.12%MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED 0.89%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.09%BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES UNITS 0.74%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

EFA and PFF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
PFF
iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isDeveloped markets ex USPreferred and Income Securities
Total return, 1 year+18.2%−0.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+0.7 pts−18.3 pts
Expense ratio0.32%0.45%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%21.6%
Holdings670461

EFA in plain words

EFA is an index equity fund tracking the Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 670 positions, with the top ten at 13.8%.

PFF in plain words

PFF is an index equity fund tracking the Preferred and Income Securities. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.45% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 461 positions, with the top ten at 23.1%. It sat 3.2% below its high of May 8, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EFA or PFF?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EFA returned +18.2% and PFF returned −0.8%, so EFA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EFA or PFF?
EFA charges 0.32% a year and PFF charges 0.45%, so EFA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EFA and PFF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EFA and 22% of PFF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EFA against PFF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EFA against PFF, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/efa-vs-pff Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources