Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EFA vs QBIF: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

EFA and QBIF are measured over different days, and EFA charges 0.32% to QBIF's 0.74%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EFA and QBIF

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $76.8bn for iShares MSCI EAFE ETF and $8.5m for AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF - Jan.

At a glance
+12.1%
EFA total return, 1 year
+3.5%
QBIF total return, since launch, Apr 1, 2026
0.32%
EFA expense ratio
0.74%
QBIF expense ratio

Pair scorecard

EFA costs 0.42 points a year less; EFA is far larger, $76.8bn against $8.5m.

EFA vs QBIF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEFAQBIF
Return
Total return, 1 year+12.1%not published
Drawdown
Below its high4.7%, high on Aug 25, 2026
Index fall to the buffer0.0%
Fund price fall to the buffer0.4%
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI EAFE IndexEFA
The outcome period
Room to the cap2.7%
Buffer left, in index points14.8% of 15.0%
Days left in the period64
Period endsDec 31, 2026
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.32%0.74%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$76.8bn$8.5m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund14.3%

Method

Side by side

EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF QBIF AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 ETF - Jan
Where it sits Stock ETF Buffer ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Developed markets ex US Defined outcome, 15% on EFA
Total return, 1 year +12.1% +3.5% (since launch, Apr 1, 2026)
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (ACWX) +5.1% (EFA) (since launch, Apr 1, 2026)
Gap to its benchmark −2.2 pts vs ACWX −1.6 pts vs EFA (since launch, Apr 1, 2026)
Expense ratio 0.32% 0.74%
Holdings 665 not read by ETFIQ
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $76.8bn $8.5m

EFA and QBIF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EFA flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EFA

EFA tracks an index of Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 665 positions, with the top ten at 14.3%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

QBIF

From its price on Oct 28, 2026, the fund can gain about 2.7% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 0.4% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, EFA can fall 0.0% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 14.8% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's EFA level. 64 days remained on Oct 28, 2026. On Dec 31, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Are EFA and QBIF in the same category?
EFA is a stock ETF and QBIF is a buffer ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which is cheaper, EFA or QBIF?
EFA is cheaper, by 0.42 percentage points a year. That is about $42 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EFA against QBIF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/efa-vs-qbif

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.