Which returned more over the last year, EFA or IOCT?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EFA returned +18.2% and IOCT returned +11.8%, so EFA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, EFA or IOCT?

EFA charges 0.32% a year and IOCT charges 0.85%, so EFA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Are EFA and IOCT the same kind of fund?

No. EFA is an index ETF and IOCT is a buffer ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

EFA vs IOCT: how they differ

Over the year EFA returned more, +18.2% against +11.8%, and EFA charges 0.32% against 0.85%.

iShares MSCI EAFE ETF and Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF - Oct.

EFA and IOCT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF	IOCT Innovator Intl Developed Power Buffer ETF - Oct
Where it sits	Core index fund	Buffer ETF
Issuer	iShares	Innovator
What it is	Developed markets ex US	Defined outcome, 15% on EFA
Total return, 1 year	+18.2%	+11.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+18.2%
Gap to the S&P 500	+0.7 pts	−6.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.32%	0.85%
Holdings	670	not filed

EFA in plain words

EFA is an index equity fund tracking the Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 670 positions, with the top ten at 13.8%.

IOCT in plain words

EFA had already risen past this fund's cap of +13.9% for the period on Sep 13, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's own price can still drift up to about 1.0% as the period runs out. The fund's price can fall 11.4% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, EFA can fall 12.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's EFA level. 19 days remained on Sep 13, 2026. On Sep 30, 2026 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EFA or IOCT?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EFA returned +18.2% and IOCT returned +11.8%, so EFA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, EFA or IOCT?: EFA charges 0.32% a year and IOCT charges 0.85%, so EFA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are EFA and IOCT the same kind of fund?: No. EFA is an index ETF and IOCT is a buffer ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EFA against IOCT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EFA against IOCT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/efa-vs-ioct Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources