Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EFA vs YJUN: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EFA returned +12.1% to YJUN's +6.6%, and EFA charges 0.32% to YJUN's 0.90%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EFA and YJUN

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $76.8bn for iShares MSCI EAFE ETF and $152m for FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June.

At a glance
+12.1%
EFA total return, 1 year
+6.6%
YJUN total return, 1 year
0.32%
EFA expense ratio
0.90%
YJUN expense ratio

Pair scorecard

EFA costs 0.58 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.5 points; EFA is far larger, $76.8bn against $152m.

EFA vs YJUN: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEFAYJUN
Return
Total return, 1 year+12.1%+6.6%
Drawdown
Below its high4.7%, high on Aug 25, 2026
Index fall to the buffer0.0%
Fund price fall to the buffer0.7%
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI EAFE IndexEFA
The outcome period
Room to the cap14.0%
Buffer left, in index points14.3% of 15.0%
Days left in the period232
Period endsJun 17, 2027
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.32%0.90%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$76.8bn$152m
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund14.3%

Method

Side by side

EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF YJUN FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June
Where it sits Stock ETF Buffer ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Developed markets ex US Defined outcome, 15% on EFA
Total return, 1 year +12.1% +6.6%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.3% (ACWX) +8.4% (EFA)
Gap to its benchmark −2.2 pts vs ACWX −1.8 pts vs EFA
Expense ratio 0.32% 0.90%
Holdings 665 not read by ETFIQ
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $76.8bn $152m

EFA and YJUN on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EFA and YJUN flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EFA

EFA tracks an index of Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 665 positions, with the top ten at 14.3%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

YJUN

From its price on Oct 28, 2026, the fund can gain about 14.0% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 0.7% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, EFA can fall 0.0% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 14.3% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's EFA level. 232 days remained on Oct 28, 2026. On Jun 17, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

Questions people ask

Are EFA and YJUN in the same category?
EFA is a stock ETF and YJUN is a buffer ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, EFA or YJUN?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EFA returned +12.1% and YJUN +6.6%.
Which is cheaper, EFA or YJUN?
EFA is cheaper, by 0.58 percentage points a year. That is about $58 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EFA against YJUN, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/efa-vs-yjun

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.