EFA vs HEFA: Differences, Returns & Fees

EFA and HEFA hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and HEFA returned +19.3% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $76.5bn for iShares MSCI EAFE ETF and $7.5bn for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF.

EFA costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.5 points; EFA is 10.2 times larger.

EFAHEFA
Expense ratio0.32%0.35%
Net assets$76.5bn$7.5bn
Total return, 1 year+13.8%+19.3%
What it tracksMSCI EAFE Indexnot read by ETFIQ
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund14.2%100.0%
Below its high5.0%, high on Aug 25, 20263.2%, high on Aug 13, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+13.8%
EFA total return, 1 year
+19.3%
HEFA total return, 1 year
0.32%
EFA expense ratio
0.35%
HEFA expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EFA and HEFA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding EFA HEFA
Only in EFA
ASML HOLDING 3.35%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.47%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.40%
SHELL 1.36%
NOVARTIS AG 1.22%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.12%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 1.12%
NESTLE SA 1.11%
Only in HEFA
ISHARES MSCI EAFE ETF 99.10%
EUR/USD 0.52%
JPY/USD 0.26%
GBP/USD 0.07%
DKK/USD 0.02%
JPY/USD 0.01%
SEK/USD 0.01%
SGD/USD 0.01%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
HEFA
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Developed markets ex US Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +13.8% +19.3%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −3.5 pts +2.0 pts
Expense ratio 0.32% 0.35%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 659 97
Net assets $76.5bn $7.5bn

EFA and HEFA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

EFA in plain words

EFA tracks an index of Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 659 positions, with the top ten at 14.2%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

HEFA in plain words

HEFA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 97 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, EFA or HEFA?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EFA returned +13.8% and HEFA +19.3%.
Which is cheaper, EFA or HEFA?
EFA is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do EFA and HEFA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of EFA and 0% of HEFA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EFA against HEFA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/efa-vs-hefa

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.