Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

EAPR vs EEM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, EAPR returned +12.5% to EEM's +16.3%, and EEM charges 0.72% to EAPR's 0.89%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about EAPR and EEM

Net assets: $95m on Oct 28, 2026 for Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - Apr, and $29.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF.

At a glance
+12.5%
EAPR total return, 1 year
+16.3%
EEM total return, 1 year
0.89%
EAPR expense ratio
0.72%
EEM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

EEM costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.8 points; EEM is far larger, $29.1bn against $94m.

EAPR vs EEM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureEAPREEM
Return
Total return, 1 year+12.5%+16.3%
Drawdown
Below its high10.8%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Index fall to the buffer10.5%
Fund price fall to the buffer9.3%
Benchmark
What it tracksEEMMSCI Emerging Markets Index
The outcome period
Room to the cap12.8%
Buffer left, in index points15.0% of 15.0%
Days left in the period154
Period endsMar 31, 2027
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.89%0.72%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$94m$29.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund37.2%

Method

Side by side

EAPR Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - Apr EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Where it sits Buffer ETF Stock ETF
What it is Defined outcome, 15% on EEM Tracks an index of Emerging markets
Total return, 1 year +12.5% +16.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +14.1% (EEM) not measured
Gap to its benchmark −1.6 pts vs EEM not measured
Expense ratio 0.89% 0.72%
Holdings not read by ETFIQ 1186
Net assets, EAPR as of Oct 28, 2026 and EEM as of Oct 27, 2026 $95m $29.1bn

EAPR and EEM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

EAPR and EEM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
EAPR

From its price on Oct 28, 2026, the fund can gain about 12.8% more before it reaches its cap. The fund's price can fall 9.3% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, EEM can fall 10.5% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 15.0% of the 15.0% buffer still sits below today's EEM level. 154 days remained on Oct 28, 2026. On Mar 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

EEM

EEM tracks an index of Emerging markets. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,186 positions, with the top ten at 37.2%. It sat 10.8% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are EAPR and EEM in the same category?
EAPR is a buffer ETF and EEM is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, EAPR or EEM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EAPR returned +12.5% and EEM +16.3%.
Which is cheaper, EAPR or EEM?
EEM is cheaper, by 0.17 percentage points a year. That is about $17 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, EAPR against EEM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/eapr-vs-eem

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.