EAGG vs UITB: Differences, Returns & Fees
EAGG's duration was 5.9 years on May 31, 2026 and UITB's 5.6 on Jun 30, 2026; EAGG charges 0.10% to UITB's 0.38%. Net assets: $5.0bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares ESG Aware U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF, and $2.7bn on Jun 30, 2026 for VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF.
EAGG costs 0.28 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; EAGG is 1.8 times larger.
| EAGG | UITB | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.10% | 0.38% |
| Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026 | $4.9bn | $2.7bn |
| Total return, 1 year | −1.7% | −1.6% |
| What it tracks | Bloomberg MSCI US Aggregate ESG Focus Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 13% | |
| Below its high | 5.4%, high on Aug 4, 2020 | 4.2%, high on Feb 27, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EAGG and UITB hold 13% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
half
13% in common
On the same fields
EAGG and UITB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EAGG in plain words
EAGG tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −1.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Oct 9, 2026.
UITB in plain words
UITB is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned −1.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.38% a year. It sat 4.2% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, EAGG or UITB?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, EAGG returned −1.7% and UITB −1.6%.
- Which is cheaper, EAGG or UITB?
- EAGG is cheaper, by 0.28 percentage points a year. That is about $28 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, EAGG against UITB, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/eagg-vs-uitb
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). EAGG against UITB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/eagg-vs-uitb
[EAGG against UITB (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/eagg-vs-uitb)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.