DGS vs JEMA: Differences, Returns & Fees
DGS and JEMA hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and JEMA returned +33.0% over the year. Net assets: $1.8bn on Jun 30, 2026 for WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund, and $1.8bn on Oct 9, 2026 for JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF.
JEMA costs 0.25 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 15.9 points.
| DGS | JEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.58% | 0.33% |
| Net assets, DGS as of Jun 30, 2026 and JEMA as of Oct 9, 2026 | $1.8bn | $1.8bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.1% | +33.0% |
| What it tracks | WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 2% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 11.4% | 39.4% |
| Below its high | 5.8%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DGS and JEMA hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
2% in common
On the same fields
DGS and JEMA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About DGS
DGS tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.58% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,012 positions, with the top ten at 11.4%.
About JEMA
JEMA is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +33.0% with distributions reinvested, against +26.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 482 positions, with the top ten at 39.4%. It sat 5.8% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DGS or JEMA?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGS returned +17.1% and JEMA +33.0%.
- Which is cheaper, DGS or JEMA?
- JEMA is cheaper, by 0.25 percentage points a year. That is about $25 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DGS against JEMA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgs-vs-jema
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). DGS against JEMA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgs-vs-jema
[DGS against JEMA (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgs-vs-jema)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.