DGRW vs LCTU: Differences, Returns & Fees
DGRW and LCTU hold 46% of their weight in the same names, and LCTU returned +15.3% over the year. Net assets: $16.6bn on Jun 30, 2026 for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund, and $1.2bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness Aware Active ETF.
LCTU costs 0.13 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.4 points; DGRW is 11.2 times larger.
| DGRW | LCTU | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.28% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026 | $16.6bn | $1.5bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.9% | +15.3% |
| What it tracks | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 46% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 36.1% | 35.5% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and LCTU hold 46% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
half
46% in common
On the same fields
DGRW and LCTU on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRW in plain words
DGRW tracks an index of U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.
LCTU in plain words
LCTU is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 330 positions, with the top ten at 35.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or LCTU?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +12.9% and LCTU +15.3%.
- Which is cheaper, DGRW or LCTU?
- LCTU is cheaper, by 0.13 percentage points a year. That is about $13 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DGRW against LCTU, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgrw-vs-lctu
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). DGRW against LCTU. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgrw-vs-lctu
[DGRW against LCTU (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgrw-vs-lctu)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.