Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
DGRW vs JHML: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DGRW returned +14.7% to JHML's +17.2%; 42% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about DGRW and JHMLNet assets on Jun 30, 2026: $16.6bn for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund and $1.2bn for John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF.
Pair scorecard
DGRW costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.5 points; DGRW is 13.8 times larger.
| Measure | DGRW | JHML |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +14.7% | +17.2% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index | John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.28% | 0.29% |
| Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026 | $16.6bn | $1.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 42% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 36.1% | 23.0% |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, DGRW and JHML hold 42% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
half
42% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
DGRW and JHML on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
DGRW
DGRW tracks an index of U.S. Quality Dividend Growth. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +14.7% with distributions reinvested, against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.28% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 197 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +14.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.
JHML tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 780 positions, with the top ten at 23.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DGRW or JHML?
- In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRW returned +14.7% and JHML +17.2%.
- Which is cheaper, DGRW or JHML?
- DGRW is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DGRW against JHML, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgrw-vs-jhml
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). DGRW against JHML. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgrw-vs-jhml
[DGRW against JHML (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgrw-vs-jhml)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.