Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs IWO: how they differ

DGRO and IWO hold 1% of their weight in the same names.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and IWO hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and IWO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGROIWO
USD CASH0.18%0.14%
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY0.06%0.11%
INSTALLED BUILDING PRODUCTS0.04%0.32%
MAGNOLIA OIL GAS CORP CLASS A0.03%0.42%
UMB FINANCIAL0.03%0.06%
COMMERCIAL METALS0.02%0.08%
FIRST FINANCIAL BANKSHARES INC0.02%0.14%
GATX0.02%0.03%
HERC HOLDINGS0.02%0.28%
KONTOOR BRANDS0.02%0.24%
SERVISFIRST BANCSHARES INC0.02%0.28%
VICTORY CAPITAL HOLDINGS CLASS A0.02%0.10%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in IWO
MICROSOFT 3.45%GLAUKOS 0.65%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.20%JFROG 0.64%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3.20%BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES INC 0.62%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 3.07%BRINKER INTERNATIONAL INC 0.61%
APPLE 3.04%INTERDIGITAL INC 0.60%
ABBVIE 3.02%KRYSTAL BIOTECH 0.59%
BROADCOM INC 2.38%PROTAGONIST THERAPEUTICS 0.59%
PROCTER & GAMBLE 2.16%PRAXIS PRECISION MEDICINES 0.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

DGRO and IWO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
IWO
iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isCore Dividend GrowthRussell 2000 Growth
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+17.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts−0.5 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.24%
Already in the S&P 50094.7%0.0%
Holdings387970

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 27.8%.

IWO in plain words

IWO is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000 Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 970 positions, with the top ten at 6.2%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or IWO?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and IWO returned +17.0%, so DGRO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or IWO?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and IWO charges 0.24%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and IWO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 0% of IWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against IWO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against IWO, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgro-vs-iwo Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources