Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DGRO vs MOAT: how they differ
DGRO and MOAT hold 10% of their weight in the same names, and DGRO returned more over the year.
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and MOAT hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DGRO | MOAT |
|---|---|---|
| MICROSOFT | 3.45% | 2.79% |
| BROADCOM INC | 2.38% | 2.23% |
| PEPSICO | 1.64% | 1.14% |
| MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL INC CLASS A | 0.57% | 2.43% |
| APPLIED MATERIAL INC | 0.34% | 1.41% |
| AMPHENOL CORP CLASS A | 0.29% | 1.31% |
| NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP | 0.27% | 1.12% |
| DANAHER | 0.24% | 2.44% |
| MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC | 0.20% | 1.34% |
| THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC | 0.19% | 1.36% |
| ZOETIS INC CLASS A | 0.18% | 1.77% |
| NXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV | 0.16% | 1.24% |
| Only in DGRO | Only in MOAT |
|---|---|
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.20% | Veeva Systems Inc 3.41% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3.20% | Airbnb Inc 2.88% |
| EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 3.07% | Charles Schwab Corp/The 2.75% |
| APPLE 3.04% | Lpl Financial Holdings Inc 2.73% |
| ABBVIE 3.02% | Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.58% |
| PROCTER & GAMBLE 2.16% | Nvidia Corp 2.58% |
| MERCK & CO INC 2.14% | Estee Lauder Cos Inc/The 2.52% |
| PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC 2.13% | Palo Alto Networks Inc 2.40% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.
| DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF | MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | iShares | VanEck |
| What it is | Core Dividend Growth | Morningstar Wide Moat |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.4% | +11.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.1 pts | −6.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.08% | 0.46% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 94.7% | 91.6% |
| Holdings | 387 | 55 |
DGRO in plain words
DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 27.8%.
MOAT in plain words
MOAT is an index equity fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 55 positions, with the top ten at 27.1%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or MOAT?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and MOAT returned +11.3%, so DGRO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DGRO or MOAT?
- DGRO charges 0.08% a year and MOAT charges 0.46%, so DGRO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DGRO and MOAT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 92% of MOAT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 10% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against MOAT, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgro-vs-moat Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources