Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DGRO vs IJH: how they differ

DGRO and IJH hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and DGRO returned more over the year.

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and IJH hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DGRO and IJH both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDGROIJH
EAST WEST BANCORP0.10%0.51%
ESSENTIAL UTILITIES INC0.10%0.34%
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL INC0.10%0.31%
OGE ENERGY0.08%0.28%
OVINTIV0.08%0.50%
DT MIDSTREAM0.07%0.38%
EQUITABLE HOLDINGS0.07%0.40%
OLD REPUBLIC INTERNATIONAL0.07%0.26%
AMERICAN FINANCIAL GROUP0.06%0.28%
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY0.06%0.16%
BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON HOLDING CLASS0.06%0.26%
CULLEN FROST BANKERS0.06%0.29%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DGROOnly in IJH
MICROSOFT 3.45%TWILIO CLASS A 1.00%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.20%ILLUMINA INC 0.87%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3.20%TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.86%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 3.07%EVERPURE INC CLASS A 0.85%
APPLE 3.04%OKTA CLASS A 0.82%
ABBVIE 3.02%ATI 0.78%
BROADCOM INC 2.38%TENET HEALTHCARE CORP 0.65%
PROCTER & GAMBLE 2.16%CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY 0.64%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

DGRO and IJH on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isCore Dividend GrowthS&P MidCap 400
Total return, 1 year+17.4%+13.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.1 pts−4.1 pts
Expense ratio0.08%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50094.7%0.0%
Holdings387405

DGRO in plain words

DGRO is an index equity fund tracking the Core Dividend Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 387 positions, with the top ten at 27.8%.

IJH in plain words

IJH is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 405 positions, with the top ten at 7.8%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or IJH?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +17.4% and IJH returned +13.4%, so DGRO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or IJH?
DGRO charges 0.08% a year and IJH charges 0.05%, so IJH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and IJH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 95% of DGRO and 0% of IJH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DGRO against IJH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DGRO against IJH, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgro-vs-ijh Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources