Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IJH vs VLUE: how they differ

IJH and VLUE hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and VLUE returned more over the year.

iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF and iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IJH and VLUE hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions IJH and VLUE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingIJHVLUE
TWILIO CLASS A1.00%0.38%
OKTA CLASS A0.82%0.26%
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY0.16%0.15%
W. P. CAREY REIT0.44%0.15%
UNITED THERAPEUTICS0.61%0.14%
ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT REIT0.46%0.12%
TRANSUNION0.42%0.11%
COEUR MINING0.60%0.09%
COREBRIDGE FINANCIAL INC0.24%0.08%
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS0.43%0.07%
FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL INC0.31%0.06%
CASH COLLATERAL USD SGAFT0.01%0.01%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IJHOnly in VLUE
ILLUMINA INC 0.87%MICRON TECHNOLOGY 21.65%
TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.86%CISCO SYSTEMS INC 4.14%
EVERPURE INC CLASS A 0.85%GENERAL MOTORS 3.72%
ATI 0.78%VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 3.05%
NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.72%AT&T 2.69%
TENET HEALTHCARE CORP 0.65%BANK OF AMERICA 2.15%
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY 0.64%FORD MOTOR CO 1.94%
XPO 0.61%COMCAST CLASS A 1.79%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

IJH and VLUE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
VLUE
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isS&P MidCap 400MSCI USA Value Factor
Total return, 1 year+13.4%+69.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−4.1 pts+51.9 pts
Expense ratio0.05%0.15%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%96.9%
Holdings405148

IJH in plain words

IJH is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 405 positions, with the top ten at 7.8%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VLUE in plain words

VLUE is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Value Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +69.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 148 positions, with the top ten at 44.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IJH or VLUE?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IJH returned +13.4% and VLUE returned +69.4%, so VLUE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IJH or VLUE?
IJH charges 0.05% a year and VLUE charges 0.15%, so IJH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IJH and VLUE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IJH and 97% of VLUE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IJH against VLUE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IJH against VLUE, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ijh-vs-vlue Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources