Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CPRA vs IWM: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CPRA returned +6.5% to IWM's +14.1%, and IWM charges 0.19% to CPRA's 0.69%.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CPRA and IWM

Net assets: $13m on Oct 28, 2026 for Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April, and $75.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 2000 ETF.

At a glance
+6.5%
CPRA total return, 1 year
+14.1%
IWM total return, 1 year
0.69%
CPRA expense ratio
0.19%
IWM expense ratio

Pair scorecard

IWM costs 0.50 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.6 points; IWM is far larger, $75.5bn against $13m.

CPRA vs IWM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCPRAIWM
Return
Total return, 1 year+6.5%+14.1%
Drawdown
Below its high7.6%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Index fall to the buffer11.3%
Fund price fall to the buffer4.2%
Benchmark
What it tracksIWMRussell 2000 Index
The outcome period
Buffer left, in index points100.0% of 100.0%
Days left in the period154
Period endsMar 31, 2027
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.69%0.19%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$13m$75.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in commonnot published
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund3.3%

Method

Side by side

CPRA Calamos Russell 2000 Structured Alt Protection ETF - April IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sits Buffer ETF Stock ETF
What it is Defined outcome, 100% on IWM Tracks the Russell 2000
Total return, 1 year +6.5% +14.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.0% (IWM) +14.3% (VTWO)
Gap to its benchmark −6.5 pts vs IWM −0.2 pts vs VTWO
Expense ratio 0.69% 0.19%
Holdings not read by ETFIQ 1977
Net assets, CPRA as of Oct 28, 2026 and IWM as of Oct 27, 2026 $13m $75.5bn

CPRA and IWM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

IWM flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CPRA

IWM had already risen past this fund's cap of +7.9% for the period on Oct 28, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect.

The fund's price can fall 4.2% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's number. In index terms, IWM can fall 11.3% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 100.0% of the 100.0% buffer still sits below today's IWM level. 154 days remained on Oct 28, 2026. On Mar 31, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

IWM

IWM tracks the Russell 2000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested, against +14.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 2000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,977 positions, with the top ten at 3.3%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Are CPRA and IWM in the same category?
CPRA is a buffer ETF and IWM is a stock ETF, so they do different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and holdings.
Which returned more over the last year, CPRA or IWM?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CPRA returned +6.5% and IWM +14.1%.
Which is cheaper, CPRA or IWM?
IWM is cheaper, by 0.50 percentage points a year. That is about $50 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CPRA against IWM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cpra-vs-iwm

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.