Which returned more over the last year, CPRY or IWM?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CPRY returned +8.8% and IWM returned +21.2%, so IWM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, CPRY or IWM?

CPRY charges 0.69% a year and IWM charges 0.19%, so IWM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Are CPRY and IWM the same kind of fund?

No. CPRY is a buffer ETF and IWM is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CPRY vs IWM: how they differ

Over the year IWM returned more, +21.2% against +8.8%, and IWM charges 0.19% against 0.69%.

Calamos Russell 2000 ® Structured Alt Protection ETF - January and iShares Russell 2000 ETF.

CPRY and IWM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	CPRY Calamos Russell 2000 ® Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Where it sits	Buffer ETF	Core index fund
Issuer	Calamos	iShares
What it is	Defined outcome, 0% to 100% on IWM	Russell 2000
Total return, 1 year	+8.8%	+21.2%
S&P 500 over the same days	+21.2%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−12.4 pts	+3.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.69%	0.19%
Holdings	not filed	1749

CPRY in plain words

IWM had already risen past this fund's cap of +7.0% for the period on Sep 13, 2026, so in index terms there is no more upside to collect. The fund's price can fall 4.9% from here before the buffer starts absorbing losses, by the issuer's figure. In index terms, IWM can fall 14.3% from today's level to the point where the buffer begins. Protection left, in index points: 99.5% of the 99.5% buffer still sits below today's IWM level. 111 days remained on Sep 13, 2026. On Jan 2, 2027 the period ends and a new cap is set.

IWM in plain words

IWM is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 2000. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1749 positions, with the top ten at 3.2%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CPRY or IWM?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CPRY returned +8.8% and IWM returned +21.2%, so IWM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CPRY or IWM?: CPRY charges 0.69% a year and IWM charges 0.19%, so IWM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Are CPRY and IWM the same kind of fund?: No. CPRY is a buffer ETF and IWM is an index ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CPRY against IWM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CPRY against IWM, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cpry-vs-iwm Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources