COWZ vs RPV: how they differ
COWZ and RPV hold 23% of their weight in the same names, and COWZ returned +22.9% over the year. Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF.
RPV costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.7 points; COWZ is 11.3 times larger.
| COWZ | RPV | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, COWZ as of Jul 31, 2026 and RPV as of Oct 9, 2026 | $18.7bn | $1.7bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +22.9% | +22.2% |
| Holdings in common | 23% | |
| Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year | +23.6% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 20.4% | 22.6% |
| Below its high | 5.1%, high on Sep 3, 2026 | 4.4%, high on Sep 3, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and RPV hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
half
23% in common
On the same fields
COWZ and RPV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COWZ in plain words
COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +22.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
RPV in plain words
RPV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +22.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 120 positions, with the top ten at 22.6%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or RPV?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +22.9% and RPV +22.2%.
- Which is cheaper, COWZ or RPV?
- RPV is cheaper, by 0.14 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $14. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
ETFIQ, COWZ against RPV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-rpv
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). COWZ against RPV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-rpv
[COWZ against RPV (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-rpv)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.