IWS vs RPV: how they differ

IWS and RPV hold 23% of their weight in the same names, and RPV returned +22.2% over the year. iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF.

IWS costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.0 points; IWS is 9.3 times larger.

IWSRPV
Expense ratio0.23%0.35%
Net assets$15.3bn$1.7bn
Total return, 1 year+20.2%+22.2%
Holdings in common23%
Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year+23.6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund7.0%22.6%
Below its high4.6%, high on Aug 14, 20264.4%, high on Sep 3, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

+20.2%
IWS total return, 1 year
+22.2%
RPV total return, 1 year
0.23%
IWS expense ratio
0.35%
RPV expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWS and RPV hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

half

23% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IWS RPV
PHILLIPS 66 1.06% 2.19%
HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE 0.94% 2.52%
MARATHON PETROLEUM 0.67% 2.14%
ALLSTATE CORP 0.59% 0.68%
DEVON ENERGY 0.55% 0.71%
NUCOR 0.54% 0.73%
FORD MOTOR CO 0.48% 1.73%
DELTA AIR LINES 0.47% 0.88%
STATE STREET 0.47% 0.62%
HUMANA 0.46% 2.36%
ONEOK 0.57% 0.45%
OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORP 0.44% 0.70%
Only in IWS
MODERNA 0.72%
DIGITAL REALTY TRUST REIT 0.65%
KINDER MORGAN 0.63%
AMETEK INC 0.57%
BAKER HUGHES CLASS A 0.56%
CHENIERE ENERGY 0.54%
REALTY INCOME REIT 0.51%
BECTON DICKINSON 0.50%
Only in RPV
Valero Energy Corp 2.39%
Target Corp 1.93%
General Motors Co 1.79%
CVS Health Corp 1.78%
Cigna Group/The 1.66%
Elevance Health Inc 1.60%
McKesson Corp 1.07%
MetLife Inc 0.96%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
RPV
Invesco S&P 500 Pure Value ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +20.2% +22.2%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +3.0 pts +5.0 pts
Expense ratio 0.23% 0.35%
Already in the S&P 500 66.1% 99.1%
Holdings 719 120
Net assets $15.3bn $1.7bn

IWS and RPV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

IWS in plain words

IWS tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.23% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 66% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 719 positions, with the top ten at 7.0%. It sat 4.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

RPV in plain words

RPV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +22.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 120 positions, with the top ten at 22.6%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWS or RPV?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWS returned +20.2% and RPV +22.2%.
Which is cheaper, IWS or RPV?
IWS is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $12. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWS and RPV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 66% of IWS and 99% of RPV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, IWS against RPV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iws-vs-rpv

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.