Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

COWZ vs HYMB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, COWZ returned +24.4% to HYMB's −1.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about COWZ and HYMB

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $19.5bn for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and $3.8bn for State Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF.

At a glance
+24.4%
COWZ total return, 1 year
−1.0%
HYMB total return, 1 year
0.49%
COWZ expense ratio
0.35%
HYMB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

HYMB costs 0.14 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 25.4 points; COWZ is 5.1 times larger.

COWZ vs HYMB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCOWZHYMB
Return
Total return, 1 year+24.4%−1.0%
Drawdown
Below its high4.7%, high on Jul 2, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksPacer US Cash Cows 100 IndexICE US Select High Yield Crossover Municipal Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.49%0.35%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$19.5bn$3.8bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight95%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund20.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and HYMB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first COWZ HYMB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in COWZ
Booking Holdings Inc 2.23%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.18%
HCA Healthcare Inc 2.07%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 2.06%
General Dynamics Corp 2.05%
Intuit Inc 2.04%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.97%
AT&T Inc 1.95%
Only in HYMB
PRCGEN 5.000 07/01/58 1.94%
PRCGEN 4.784 07/01/58 1.25%
BUCGEN 5.000 06/01/55 1.08%
PRC 4.000 07/01/46 0.64%
PRCGEN 4.329 07/01/40 0.61%
NYCDEV 5.000 11/15/44 0.49%
PRC 4.000 07/01/41 0.47%
CHIEDU 6.000 12/01/41 0.46%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF HYMB State Street SPDR Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100 Tracks an index of Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond
Total return, 1 year +24.4% −1.0%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −1.4% (AGG)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +0.4 pts vs AGG
Expense ratio 0.49% 0.35%
Holdings 100 2105
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $19.5bn $3.8bn

COWZ and HYMB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

COWZ and HYMB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
COWZ

COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.

HYMB

HYMB tracks an index of Nuveen ICE High Yield Municipal Bond. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.0% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. It sat 4.7% below its high of Jul 2, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or HYMB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +24.4% and HYMB −1.0%.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or HYMB?
HYMB is cheaper, by 0.14 percentage points a year. That is about $14 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, COWZ against HYMB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-hymb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.