Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

COWZ vs HYG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, COWZ returned +24.4% to HYG's +1.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about COWZ and HYG

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $19.5bn for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and $17.5bn for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF.

At a glance
+24.4%
COWZ total return, 1 year
+1.3%
HYG total return, 1 year
0.49%
COWZ expense ratio
0.49%
HYG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

Both cost 0.49% a year; their one-year returns differ by 23.1 points; COWZ is 1.1 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

COWZ vs HYG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCOWZHYG
Return
Total return, 1 year+24.4%+1.3%
Benchmark
What it tracksPacer US Cash Cows 100 IndexMarkit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.49%0.49%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$19.5bn$17.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight95%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund20.4%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and HYG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first COWZ HYG
Only in one fund ↓
Only in COWZ
Booking Holdings Inc 2.23%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.18%
HCA Healthcare Inc 2.07%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 2.06%
General Dynamics Corp 2.05%
Intuit Inc 2.04%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.97%
AT&T Inc 1.95%
Only in HYG
1261229 BC LTD 144A 0.56%
MERIDIAN ARC HOLDCO LLC 144A 0.44%
ECHOSTAR CORP 0.40%
QUIKRETE HOLDINGS INC 144A 0.35%
PR RNO PROPERTY OWNER 1 LLC 144A 0.34%
CLOUD SOFTWARE GROUP LLC 144A 0.32%
SOFTBANK GROUP CORP 144A 0.32%
CENTENE CORPORATION 0.31%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
Issuer Pacer iShares
What it is Tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100 Tracks an index of US high yield bonds
Total return, 1 year +24.4% +1.3%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −1.2% (IUSB)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +2.5 pts vs IUSB
Expense ratio 0.49% 0.49%
Holdings 100 1332
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $19.5bn $17.5bn

COWZ and HYG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

COWZ and HYG flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
COWZ

COWZ tracks an index of US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.4%.

HYG

HYG tracks an index of US high yield bonds. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +1.3% with distributions reinvested, against −1.2% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or HYG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +24.4% and HYG +1.3%.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or HYG?
Neither: COWZ and HYG both charge 0.49% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, COWZ against HYG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowz-vs-hyg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.