Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
COWG vs JHMM: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, COWG returned +10.7% to JHMM's +18.0%; 8% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about COWG and JHMM
Net assets: $2.3bn on Nov 3, 2026 for Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF, and $5.8bn on Jun 30, 2026 for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF.
Pair scorecard
JHMM costs 0.08 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.3 points.
| Measure | COWG | JHMM |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +10.7% | +18.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 5.7%, high on Oct 9, 2026 | 3.5%, high on Aug 14, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index | John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.41% |
| Net assets, COWG as of Nov 3, 2026 and JHMM as of Jun 30, 2026 | $2.3bn | $5.8bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 8% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 28.4% | 6.1% |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, COWG and JHMM hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
8% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
COWG and JHMM on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +10.7% with distributions reinvested, against +14.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.
COWG tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 65% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 28.4%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Oct 9, 2026 on Nov 4, 2026.
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +14.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
JHMM tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.41% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 52% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 662 positions, with the top ten at 6.1%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Nov 4, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, COWG or JHMM?
- In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWG returned +10.7% and JHMM +18.0%.
- Which is cheaper, COWG or JHMM?
- JHMM is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. That is about $8 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, COWG against JHMM, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowg-vs-jhmm
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). COWG against JHMM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowg-vs-jhmm
[COWG against JHMM (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cowg-vs-jhmm)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.