Which returned more over the last year, CORO or MCHI?

In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CORO returned +18.6% and MCHI −23.3%.

Which is cheaper, CORO or MCHI?

CORO is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

How much do CORO and MCHI overlap with the S&P 500?

By their latest filed holdings, 0% of CORO and 0% of MCHI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Across categories

CORO vs MCHI: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CORO returned +18.6% to MCHI's −23.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CORO and MCHI

Net assets: $13.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares International Country Rotation Active ETF, and $5.5bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI China ETF.

CORO on its own →MCHI on its own →

At a glance

+18.6%

CORO total return, 1 year

−23.3%

MCHI total return, 1 year

0.55%

CORO expense ratio

0.59%

MCHI expense ratio

Pair scorecard

CORO costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 41.9 points; CORO is 2.5 times larger.

CORO vs MCHI: Differences, Returns & Fees
Measure	CORO	MCHI
Return
Measure	CORO	MCHI
Total return, 1 year	+18.6%	−23.3%
Drawdown
Measure	CORO	MCHI
Below its high	4.5%, high on Sep 4, 2026	43.9%, high on Feb 17, 2021
Benchmark
Measure	CORO	MCHI
What it tracks	No index, actively managed	MSCI China Index
Cost and size
Measure	CORO	MCHI
Expense ratio	0.55%	0.59%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026	$13.5bn	$5.5bn
Holdings
Measure	CORO	MCHI
Holdings in common	0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	77.8%	41.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, CORO and MCHI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CORO MCHI

Only in one fund ↓

Only in CORO

ISHARES MSCI JAPAN ETF 19.35%

ISHARES MSCI CANADA ETF 14.05%

ISHARES MSCI SWITZERLAND ETF 9.42%

ISHARES MSCI TAIWAN CAP ETF 5.77%

ISHARES MSCI SOUTH KOREA ETF 5.54%

ISHARES MSCI UNITED KINGDOM ETF 5.37%

ISHARES MSCI SWEDEN ETF 5.35%

TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 4.74%

Only in MCHI

TENCENT HOLDINGS 13.27%

ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 9.14%

CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 4.72%

INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF 2.78%

XIAOMI 2.46%

BANK OF CHINA LTD H 2.27%

MEITUAN 2.03%

PDD HOLDINGS ADS 1.78%

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CORO iShares International Country Rotation Active ETF MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF

Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF

Issuer iShares iShares

What it is Actively managed Tracks an index

Total return, 1 year +18.6% −23.3%

Its benchmark over the same days not measured +16.3% (EEM)

Gap to its benchmark not measured −39.6 pts vs EEM

Expense ratio 0.55% 0.59%

Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%

Holdings 27 579

Net assets, CORO as of Oct 27, 2026 and MCHI as of Oct 28, 2026 $13.5bn $5.5bn

CORO and MCHI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

About each fund

CORO

CORO is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 27 positions, with the top ten at 77.8%. It sat 4.5% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MCHI

MCHI tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −23.3% with distributions reinvested, against +16.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 579 positions, with the top ten at 41.9%. It sat 43.9% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CORO or MCHI?: In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CORO returned +18.6% and MCHI −23.3%.
Which is cheaper, CORO or MCHI?: CORO is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CORO and MCHI overlap with the S&P 500?: By their latest filed holdings, 0% of CORO and 0% of MCHI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Other comparisons

CORO vs FLTW CORO vs EWT CORO vs CQQQ ASHR vs CORO EWT vs MCHI FXI vs MCHI ASHR vs MCHI EWH vs MCHI

Where to next

CORO on its own →MCHI on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →CORO dividend history →CORO holdings →MCHI dividend history →MCHI holdings →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

CORO filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

CORO prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for CORO ↗

MCHI filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

MCHI prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for MCHI ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CORO against MCHI, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/coro-vs-mchi

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.