CORO vs EFA: Differences, Returns & Fees

CORO and EFA hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and CORO returned +22.5% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $13.1bn for iShares International Country Rotation Active ETF and $76.5bn for iShares MSCI EAFE ETF.

EFA costs 0.23 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.7 points; EFA is 5.8 times larger.

COROEFA
Expense ratio0.55%0.32%
Net assets$13.1bn$76.5bn
Total return, 1 year+22.5%+13.8%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMSCI EAFE Index
Holdings in common1%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund77.4%14.2%
Below its high3.6%, high on Sep 4, 20265.0%, high on Aug 25, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+22.5%
CORO total return, 1 year
+13.8%
EFA total return, 1 year
0.55%
CORO expense ratio
0.32%
EFA expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CORO and EFA hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

1% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CORO EFA
ASML HOLDING ADR REPRESENTING 0.59% 3.35%
Only in CORO
ISHARES MSCI JAPAN ETF 19.62%
ISHARES MSCI CANADA ETF 13.40%
ISHARES MSCI SWITZERLAND ETF 8.76%
ISHARES MSCI SOUTH KOREA ETF 6.16%
ISHARES MSCI TAIWAN CAP ETF 6.07%
ISHARES MSCI SWEDEN ETF 5.23%
ISHARES MSCI UNITED KINGDOM ETF 5.22%
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 4.85%
Only in EFA
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.47%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.40%
SHELL 1.36%
NOVARTIS AG 1.22%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.12%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 1.12%
NESTLE SA 1.11%
BHP GROUP LTD 1.02%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

CORO
iShares International Country Rotation Active ETF
EFA
iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of Developed markets ex US
Total return, 1 year +22.5% +13.8%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +5.2 pts −3.5 pts
Expense ratio 0.55% 0.32%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 27 659
Net assets $13.1bn $76.5bn

CORO and EFA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CORO in plain words

CORO is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +22.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 27 positions, with the top ten at 77.4%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

EFA in plain words

EFA tracks an index of Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 659 positions, with the top ten at 14.2%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CORO or EFA?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CORO returned +22.5% and EFA +13.8%.
Which is cheaper, CORO or EFA?
EFA is cheaper, by 0.23 percentage points a year. That is about $23 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CORO and EFA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of CORO and 0% of EFA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CORO against EFA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/coro-vs-efa

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.