CLOA vs PAAA: Differences, Returns & Fees
CLOA's duration was 0.2 years on Jul 31, 2026 and PAAA's 0.1 on May 29, 2026; PAAA charges 0.19% to CLOA's 0.20%. Net assets: $2.8bn on Oct 20, 2026 for iShares AAA CLO Active ETF, and $14.9bn on Oct 19, 2026 for PGIM AAA CLO ETF.
PAAA costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points; PAAA is 5.4 times larger.
| CLOA | PAAA | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.20% | 0.19% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026 | $2.8bn | $14.9bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +5.0% | +4.8% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 12% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
CLOA and PAAA are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Holdings in common. 12% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and May 29, 2026).
- Size. CLOA has $2.8bn in net assets and PAAA $14.9bn (net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026); PAAA is 5.3 times larger.
- What each follows (similar). Both follow No index, actively managed.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CLOA and PAAA hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
12% in common
On the same fields
CLOA and PAAA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About CLOA
CLOA is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +5.0% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year.
About PAAA
PAAA is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CLOA or PAAA?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CLOA returned +5.0% and PAAA +4.8%.
- Which is cheaper, CLOA or PAAA?
- PAAA is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CLOA against PAAA, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cloa-vs-paaa
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). CLOA against PAAA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cloa-vs-paaa
[CLOA against PAAA (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cloa-vs-paaa)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.