CLIP vs TBUX: Differences, Returns & Fees
On May 31, 2026 CLIP's duration was 0.1 years and TBUX's 0.7; CLIP charges 0.07% to TBUX's 0.17%. Net assets: $2.3bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF, and $1.9bn on Oct 19, 2026 for T. Rowe Price Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF.
CLIP costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points; CLIP is 1.2 times larger.
| CLIP | TBUX | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.07% | 0.17% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026 | $2.3bn | $1.9bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.7% | +3.9% |
| What it tracks | Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026.
CLIP and TBUX are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. CLIP follows Solactive 1-3 month US T-Bill Index and TBUX follows No index, actively managed.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated May 31, 2026).
- Number of holdings. CLIP holds 25 positions and TBUX holds 622.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CLIP and TBUX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
On the same fields
CLIP and TBUX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About CLIP
CLIP tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year.
About TBUX
TBUX is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +3.9% with distributions reinvested, against −1.9% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.17% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CLIP or TBUX?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CLIP returned +3.7% and TBUX +3.9%.
- Which is cheaper, CLIP or TBUX?
- CLIP is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CLIP against TBUX, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/clip-vs-tbux
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). CLIP against TBUX. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/clip-vs-tbux
[CLIP against TBUX (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/clip-vs-tbux)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.