CGXU vs CORO: Differences, Returns & Fees

CGXU and CORO hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and CORO returned +22.5% over the year. Net assets: $6.8bn on Oct 8, 2026 for Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF, and $13.1bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares International Country Rotation Active ETF.

CGXU costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.9 points; CORO is 1.9 times larger.

CGXUCORO
Expense ratio0.54%0.55%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026$6.8bn$13.0bn
Total return, 1 year+18.6%+22.5%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common5%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund38.4%77.4%
Below its high5.1%, high on Sep 8, 20263.6%, high on Sep 4, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+18.6%
CGXU total return, 1 year
+22.5%
CORO total return, 1 year
0.54%
CGXU expense ratio
0.55%
CORO expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGXU and CORO hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

5% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CGXU CORO
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 6.83% 4.85%
Only in CGXU
SoftBank Group Corp 6.36%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd 5.12%
Capital Group Central Cash Fund 3.54%
SK hynix Inc 3.27%
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 3.10%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd 3.00%
Novo Nordisk A/S 2.46%
ASML Holding NV 2.44%
Only in CORO
ISHARES MSCI JAPAN ETF 19.62%
ISHARES MSCI CANADA ETF 13.40%
ISHARES MSCI SWITZERLAND ETF 8.76%
ISHARES MSCI SOUTH KOREA ETF 6.16%
ISHARES MSCI TAIWAN CAP ETF 6.07%
ISHARES MSCI SWEDEN ETF 5.23%
ISHARES MSCI UNITED KINGDOM ETF 5.22%
ISHARES MSCI HONG KONG ETF 4.12%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

CGXU
Capital Group International Focus Equity ETF
CORO
iShares International Country Rotation Active ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +18.6% +22.5%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +1.4 pts +5.2 pts
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.55%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 73 27
Net assets, CGXU as of Oct 8, 2026 and CORO as of Oct 9, 2026 $6.8bn $13.1bn

CGXU and CORO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CGXU in plain words

CGXU is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 73 positions, with the top ten at 38.4%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Sep 8, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

CORO in plain words

CORO is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +22.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.55% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 27 positions, with the top ten at 77.4%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGXU or CORO?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGXU returned +18.6% and CORO +22.5%.
Which is cheaper, CGXU or CORO?
CGXU is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGXU and CORO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of CGXU and 0% of CORO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGXU against CORO, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgxu-vs-coro

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.