CGMM vs PRFZ: Differences, Returns & Fees
CGMM and PRFZ hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and PRFZ returned +16.1% over the year. Net assets: $3.5bn on Oct 19, 2026 for Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF, and $2.6bn on Oct 20, 2026 for Invesco RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF.
PRFZ costs 0.15 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.0 points; CGMM is 1.4 times larger.
| CGMM | PRFZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.51% | 0.36% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026 | $3.5bn | $2.6bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +11.1% | +16.1% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | RAFI Fundamental Select US 1500 Index |
| Holdings in common | 5% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 18.7% | 4.0% |
| Below its high | 6.8%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | 6.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGMM and PRFZ hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
5% in common
On the same fields
CGMM and PRFZ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About CGMM
CGMM is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.51% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 45% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 114 positions, with the top ten at 18.7%. It sat 6.8% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +11.1% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
About PRFZ
PRFZ tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.36% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,491 positions, with the top ten at 4.0%. It sat 6.9% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +16.1% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGMM or PRFZ?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGMM returned +11.1% and PRFZ +16.1%.
- Which is cheaper, CGMM or PRFZ?
- PRFZ is cheaper, by 0.15 percentage points a year. That is about $15 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGMM against PRFZ, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgmm-vs-prfz
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). CGMM against PRFZ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgmm-vs-prfz
[CGMM against PRFZ (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgmm-vs-prfz)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.