Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGMM vs FTGS: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGMM returned +11.4% to FTGS's +5.6%; 4% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGMM and FTGS
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $3.6bn for Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF and $1.3bn for First Trust Growth Strength ETF.
Pair scorecard
CGMM costs 0.09 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.8 points; CGMM is 2.8 times larger.
| Measure | CGMM | FTGS |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +11.4% | +5.6% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 6.4%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | 4.1%, high on Aug 13, 2026 |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Growth Strength Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.51% | 0.60% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $3.6bn | $1.3bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 4% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 17.6% | 21.4% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGMM and FTGS hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
4% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGMM and FTGS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGMM and FTGS are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. CGMM follows No index, actively managed and FTGS follows Growth Strength Index.
- Holdings in common. 4% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGMM returned +11.4% and FTGS +5.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 5.8 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +11.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
CGMM is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.51% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 44% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 124 positions, with the top ten at 17.6%. It sat 6.4% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
FTGS
FTGS tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +5.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 50 positions, with the top ten at 21.4%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGMM or FTGS?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGMM returned +11.4% and FTGS +5.6%.
- Which is cheaper, CGMM or FTGS?
- CGMM is cheaper, by 0.09 percentage points a year. That is about $9 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGMM against FTGS, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgmm-vs-ftgs
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGMM against FTGS. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgmm-vs-ftgs
[CGMM against FTGS (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgmm-vs-ftgs)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.