CGMM vs MOAT: Differences, Returns & Fees
CGMM and MOAT hold 5% of their weight in the same names. Net assets on Oct 19, 2026: $3.5bn for Capital Group U.S. Small and Mid Cap ETF and $11.6bn for VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF.
MOAT costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.5 points; MOAT is 3.3 times larger.
| CGMM | MOAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.51% | 0.46% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026 | $3.5bn | $11.6bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +11.1% | +11.6% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index |
| Holdings in common | 5% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 18.7% | 26.6% |
| Below its high | 6.8%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGMM and MOAT hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
5% in common
On the same fields
CGMM and MOAT on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About CGMM
CGMM is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.51% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 45% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 114 positions, with the top ten at 18.7%. It sat 6.8% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +11.1% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
About MOAT
MOAT tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +11.6% with distributions reinvested, against +15.9% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 54 positions, with the top ten at 26.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGMM or MOAT?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGMM returned +11.1% and MOAT +11.6%.
- Which is cheaper, CGMM or MOAT?
- MOAT is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGMM against MOAT, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgmm-vs-moat
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). CGMM against MOAT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgmm-vs-moat
[CGMM against MOAT (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgmm-vs-moat)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.