CGGR vs TCHP: Differences, Returns & Fees
CGGR and TCHP hold 49% of their weight in the same names, and CGGR returned +5.8% over the year. Net assets: $26.0bn on Oct 19, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF, and $2.2bn on Oct 20, 2026 for T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth ETF.
CGGR costs 0.18 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.4 points; CGGR is 12.0 times larger.
| CGGR | TCHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.57% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026 | $26.0bn | $2.2bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +5.8% | +2.4% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 49% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 44.2% | 56.7% |
| Below its high | 5.1%, high on Jun 1, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
CGGR and TCHP are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Holdings in common. 49% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 CGGR returned +5.8% and TCHP +2.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 3.4 points.
- Cost. CGGR charges 0.39% of assets a year and TCHP 0.57%, a gap of 0.18 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and TCHP hold 49% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
half
49% in common
On the same fields
CGGR and TCHP on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested, against +15.9% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.
About TCHP
TCHP is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 66 positions, with the top ten at 56.7%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +2.4% with distributions reinvested, against +4.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or TCHP?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +5.8% and TCHP +2.4%.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or TCHP?
- CGGR is cheaper, by 0.18 percentage points a year. That is about $18 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGGR against TCHP, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-tchp
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). CGGR against TCHP. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-tchp
[CGGR against TCHP (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-tchp)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.