Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGGR vs QUAL: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to QUAL's +13.1%; 30% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGGR and QUAL

Net assets: $25.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF, and $48.2bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF.

At a glance
+2.6%
CGGR total return, 1 year
+13.1%
QUAL total return, 1 year
0.39%
CGGR expense ratio
0.15%
QUAL expense ratio

Pair scorecard

QUAL costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.5 points; QUAL is 1.9 times larger.

CGGR vs QUAL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGGRQUAL
Return
Total return, 1 year+2.6%+13.1%
Drawdown
Below its high3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedMSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.39%0.15%
Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026$25.6bn$48.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common30%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund39.7%44.5%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 242 weekly returns
CGGR QUAL
Return
Total return edge CGGR (slight) +91.6% +82.8%
Annualized edge CGGR (slight) +15.0% +13.8%
Price return edge CGGR +89.2% +72.9%
Risk
Volatility edge QUAL 20.4% 16.6%
Max drawdown edge QUAL −27.7% −22.3%
Downside capture 115.9% 98.8%
Beta 1.20 0.97
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge QUAL (slight) 0.58 0.61
Sortino edge QUAL (slight) 0.88 0.92
Treynor 0.098 0.126
Calmar edge QUAL 0.54 0.62
Against the benchmark
Alpha −1.0% a year +0.6% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.37 0.59
Information ratio 0.18 0.06
Tracking error 6.7% 3.7%

Each against its own benchmark: CGGR against VOO, Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026; QUAL against MLRG, Jul 26, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

CGGR returned slightly more: +91.6% to +82.8%. QUAL swung less: 16.6% to 20.4%. QUAL fell less at its worst: −22.3% to −27.7%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: CGGR vs QUAL: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGGRQUALEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+91.6%+82.8%CGGR (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+15.0%+13.8%CGGR (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+89.2%+72.9%CGGRPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility20.4%16.6%QUALSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation13.5%11.0%QUALLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−27.7%−22.3%QUALDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture137.1%98.8%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture115.9%98.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.200.97Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.920.95Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.580.61QUAL (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.880.92QUAL (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0980.126Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.540.62QUALAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkVOOMLRGThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−1.0% a year+0.6% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.370.59Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−6.3% to +4.3%−1.4% to +2.6%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.180.06Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error6.7%3.7%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 242 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

30%

By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and QUAL hold 30% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

30% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGGR QUAL
NVIDIA Corp 5.14% 6.28%
Microsoft Corp 4.63% 8.09%
Meta Platforms Inc 5.38% 4.06%
Visa Inc 3.33% 3.44%
Apple Inc 2.29% 7.38%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.11% 4.04%
Alphabet Inc 3.21% 1.82%
Alphabet Inc 3.06% 1.43%
Netflix Inc 0.97% 1.48%
KLA Corp 0.89% 2.05%
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc 0.88% 0.73%
Costco Wholesale Corp 0.60% 1.14%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGGR
Broadcom Inc 4.69%
Tesla Inc 4.19%
Micron Technology Inc 3.57%
Capital Group Central Cash Fund 2.54%
Amazon.com Inc 2.48%
Cloudflare Inc 2.37%
TransDigm Group Inc 1.85%
Shopify Inc 1.72%
Only in QUAL
TJX 3.50%
LAM RESEARCH 2.84%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.50%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 2.39%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.14%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.94%
ROSS STORES INC 1.41%
MERCK & CO INC 1.34%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the MSCI USA Quality Factor
Total return, 1 year +2.6% +13.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.7% (VOO) +13.6% (MLRG)
Gap to its benchmark −11.1 pts vs VOO −0.5 pts vs MLRG
Expense ratio 0.39% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 78.3% 97.2%
Holdings 96 119
Net assets, CGGR as of Oct 27, 2026 and QUAL as of Oct 28, 2026 $25.9bn $48.2bn

CGGR and QUAL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-439CEF3440

CGGR and QUAL are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. CGGR follows No index, actively managed and QUAL follows MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 30% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and QUAL +13.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 10.5 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

QUAL flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGGR

CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

QUAL

QUAL tracks the MSCI USA Quality Factor. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.6% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 119 positions, with the top ten at 44.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or QUAL?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and QUAL +13.1%.
Which is cheaper, CGGR or QUAL?
QUAL is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGGR and QUAL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 78% of CGGR and 97% of QUAL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGGR against QUAL, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-qual

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.