Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGGR vs IWB: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to IWB's +13.1%; 38% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGGR and IWB
Net assets: $25.9bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF, and $49.1bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 ETF.
Pair scorecard
IWB costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.5 points; IWB is 1.9 times larger.
| Measure | CGGR | IWB |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.6% | +13.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Russell 1000 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.15% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 26, 2026 | $25.6bn | $48.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 38% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 39.7% | 35.3% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and IWB hold 38% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
38% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGGR and IWB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR and IWB are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. CGGR follows No index, actively managed and IWB follows Russell 1000 Index.
- Holdings in common. 38% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and IWB +13.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 10.5 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
IWB
IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.2% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 35.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or IWB?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and IWB +13.1%.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or IWB?
- IWB is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGGR against IWB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-iwb
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGGR against IWB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-iwb
[CGGR against IWB (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-iwb)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.