Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGGR vs DYNF: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to DYNF's +14.5%; 37% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGGR and DYNF
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $25.9bn for Capital Group Growth ETF and $42.7bn for iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF.
Pair scorecard
DYNF costs 0.13 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.9 points; DYNF is 1.6 times larger.
| Measure | CGGR | DYNF |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.6% | +14.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.26% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $25.9bn | $42.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 37% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 39.7% | 40.7% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and DYNF hold 37% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
37% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGGR and DYNF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR and DYNF are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Holdings in common. 37% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and DYNF +14.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 11.9 points.
- Cost. CGGR charges 0.39% of assets a year and DYNF 0.26%, a gap of 0.13 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
DYNF
DYNF is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.5% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 262 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or DYNF?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and DYNF +14.5%.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or DYNF?
- DYNF is cheaper, by 0.13 percentage points a year. That is about $13 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGGR against DYNF, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-dynf
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGGR against DYNF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-dynf
[CGGR against DYNF (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-dynf)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.