CGGR vs IWY: Differences, Returns & Fees
CGGR and IWY hold 46% of their weight in the same names, and CGGR returned +5.8% over the year. Net assets: $26.0bn on Oct 19, 2026 for Capital Group Growth ETF, and $15.8bn on Oct 20, 2026 for iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF.
IWY costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.1 points; CGGR is 1.6 times larger.
| CGGR | IWY | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.20% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 19, 2026 | $26.0bn | $16.2bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +5.8% | +4.7% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Russell Top 200 Growth Index |
| Holdings in common | 46% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 44.2% | 60.9% |
| Below its high | 5.2%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and IWY hold 46% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
46% in common
On the same fields
CGGR and IWY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +5.8% with distributions reinvested, against +15.9% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.
About IWY
IWY tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 102 positions, with the top ten at 60.9%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +4.7% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or IWY?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +5.8% and IWY +4.7%.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or IWY?
- IWY is cheaper, by 0.19 percentage points a year. That is about $19 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGGR against IWY, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-iwy
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). CGGR against IWY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-iwy
[CGGR against IWY (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-iwy)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.