Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CGGR vs GSLC: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGGR returned +2.6% to GSLC's +12.0%; 36% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CGGR and GSLC
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $25.9bn for Capital Group Growth ETF and $15.2bn for Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF.
Pair scorecard
GSLC costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.4 points; CGGR is 1.7 times larger.
| Measure | CGGR | GSLC |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.6% | +12.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.4%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.09% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $25.9bn | $15.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 36% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 39.7% | 35.2% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and GSLC hold 36% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026.
half
36% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
CGGR and GSLC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR and GSLC are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. CGGR follows No index, actively managed and GSLC follows Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index.
- Holdings in common. 36% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGGR returned +2.6% and GSLC +12.0% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 9.4 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CGGR
CGGR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 78% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 39.7%. It sat 3.4% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
GSLC
GSLC tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 426 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or GSLC?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +2.6% and GSLC +12.0%.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or GSLC?
- GSLC is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. That is about $30 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CGGR against GSLC, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-gslc
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CGGR against GSLC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-gslc
[CGGR against GSLC (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-gslc)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.